HEIDE M. HESS JONES, PETITIONER,
v.
CURTIS LEE JONES, RESPONDENT
HEIDE M. HESS JONES, PETITIONER,
CURTIS LEE JONES, RESPONDENT
624 So. 2d 263
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We review Jones v. Jones, 606 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently resolved the conflict in Mize v. Mize, 621 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1993). On the authority of Mize, we quash the decision of the district court of appeal; we remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Mize.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Heide M. Hess Jones v. Jones, 633 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…PETERSON, Judge. Our decision in Jones v. Jones, 606 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) was quashed by the supreme court in Jones v. Jones, 624 So. 2d 263 (Fla.1993). The case was remanded to us for reconsideration in light of that court’s opinion in Mize v. Mize, 621 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1993), remanded, 623 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The parties met and became engaged to be married in Germany while…
-
McCLISH v. LEE, 633 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…s not consistent with the testimony presented. We remand the issue to the trial court so evi [*59] dence can be presented for a factual determination of this issue. Jones v. Jones, 606 So. 2d 748, 749 (Fla. 6th DCA 1992), quashed on other grounds by 624 So. 2d 263 (Fla.1993). Parenthetically, the trial judge raised the question of whether the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 4 — 1.5(f), allows an attorney to take this case on a contingency arrangement. This issue should be fully argued by both coun…
Authorities Cited
- Mize v. Mize, 621 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1993)
- Heide M. Hess Jones v. Jones, 606 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)