CHARLES I. FRIEDBERG, IV, APPELLANT,

v.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Higginbotham v. State, 659 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …of Criminal Procedure. [*462] On appeal, Higginbotham contends that the trial court’s oral pronouncement does not conform with the written sentence. We have jurisdiction. Sellers v. State, 591 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see also White v. State, 624 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). On the face of the record, a discrepancy exists between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. In the context of the entire plea and sentencing hearing, it appears that the discrepancy is the result of a scrivener’s e…
• Rigoberto Nodal v. State, 650 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …court in which a three-year mandatory minimum sentence was not imposed. The law is clear that the written sentence entered in a criminal case must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence in open court. See, e.g., White v. State, 624 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Urquiaga v. State, 624 So. 2d 810 (Fla. [*697] 3d DCA 1993); Kord v. State, 508 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The final judgment of convictions and sentences under review are affirmed, save for the imposition of the three-yea…
• Whitehead v. State, 654 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …ronouncement of sentence in open court.” Nodal v. State, 650 So. 2d 696, 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); see also Verble v. State, 636 So. 2d 890, 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Trueblood v. State, 635 So. 2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); White v. [*654] State, 624 So. 2d 811, 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Armstead v. State, 612 So. 2d 623, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So. 2d 948, 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Wilcher v. State, 524 So. 2d 1105, 1106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In addition, the sentences imposed for counts…