FLORENCE HICKEY, APPELLANT,
v.
POMPANO K OF C, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florence Hickey appeals the dismissal of her lawsuit for failure to prosecute under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). The appellate court reversed, holding that Hickey's filing of a motion to amend her complaint and notice of hearing within one year of the dismissal motion constituted sufficient record activity to preclude dismissal.
The filing of a motion to amend and notice of hearing is sufficient record activity to preclude dismissal for failure to prosecute, provided such activity occurs within one year of the dismissal motion and represents an affirmative act directed toward disposition of the case.
[1] Filing a motion for leave to amend a complaint, along with a notice of hearing, constitutes sufficient record activity to preclude dismissal for failure to prosecute.
[2] Record activity must be an affirmative act directed toward the disposition of a case to avoid dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“To avoid a dismissal under Rule 1.420(e), the record activity must be an affirmative act directed toward disposition of the ease.”
Establishes the legal standard for what constitutes sufficient record activity to preclude dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHickey filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint on June 26, 1991, along with a notice of hearing scheduled for July 17, 1991. The m…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Florence Hickey appeals an order denying her motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and an order granting Pompano Knights of Columbus, Inc.’s (Pompano) motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e). Hickey asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing the case because record activity transpired within one year prior to the filing of Pompano’s motion to dismiss. We agree with this contention and reverse and remand.
To avoid a dismissal under Rule 1.420(e), the record activity must be an affirmative act directed toward disposition of the ease. Bair v. Palm Beach Newspapers, 387 So. 2d 517, 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (a court order vacating an earlier dismissal and the parties’ stipulation permitting the filing of an amended complaint were sufficient record activity to preclude a dismissal for failure to prosecute); Harris v. Winn-Dixie Stores, 378 So. 2d 90, 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (a notice of taking deposition, even if cancelled, had a purpose of advancing the case toward trial).
On June 26, 1991, Hickey filed her motion for leave to file a second amended complaint together with a notice of hearing for July 17, 1991. Hickey sought to amend her complaint to sue Michael Taines individually, instead of Michael Taines, Inc. On January 22, 1992, Pompano filed its motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute.
Although Hickey’s motion for leave to amend was not heard because the hearing was cancelled after Hickey obtained new counsel, we conclude that filing the motion to amend and the notice of hearing was sufficient record activity. This record activity was an attempt to proceed against the proper party and, thus, had a purpose of advancing the case toward trial. Because this record activity did in fact occur within one year of the date of Pompano’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, we reverse the trial court’s order granting Pompano’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. On remand, the trial court should reconsider Hickey’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Harris v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 378 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Bair v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., 387 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)