JOHN FOGELMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1993-10-06
No. 92-0042
GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
625 So. 2d 893 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the defendant’s conviction and sentence. The trial court erroneously admitted evidence of similar crimes under section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). Whitehead v. State, 528 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Thompson v. State, 494 So. 2d 203 (Fla.1986). We cannot find that the error was harmless.

GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fogelman v. State, 648 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
    …convicted of the abduction and sexual battery of P.L. In that case, the state introduced the incidents involving N.A. and L.C. On appeal this court reversed, holding that the admission of this evidence of similar crimes was error. Fogelman v. State, 625 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). However, in that case, appellant did not use the defense of insanity. That difference in trial strategy explains the difference in the result here. Appellant argues that the two other crimes in this ease are not similar enough…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw