LUIS F. SOLER AND MARIA V. SOLER, PETITIONERS,
v.
INDEPENDENT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
We grant the petition for certiorari which seeks review of a circuit court order transferring a ease to the county court because the amount in controversy was less than $15,000.
The test to determine the jurisdiction of the court “is the amount in good faith claimed or put in controversy when the action is commenced.” Thibodeau v. Santini Bros., Inc., 315 So. 2d 550, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975) (quoting Castellano v. Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc., 208 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)). The valuations fixed by the pleadings ought to be accepted as true if made in good faith and not for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction, notwithstanding it might ultimately develop at trial that the amount recoverable was less than the jurisdictional limit of the circuit court. Id.
We quash the order of transfer because it cannot be concluded from the record now before us that the amount in controversy is indisputably less than $15,000 or that the allegations claiming entitlement to an amount in excess of $15,000 were not made in good faith. See Ross v. Barnett, 436 So. 2d 1040, 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Norris v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 324 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). If later developments in the case show without dispute that the amount in controversy is less than $15,000, the trial court is free to transfer the cause. Ross, 436 So. 2d at 1041; Norris, 324 So. 2d at 109.
Certiorari granted; order quashed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grunewald v. Warren, 655 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…s, and it is plain that the amount stated is in excess of the real demand.” 13 Fla.Jur.2d, Courts and Judges § 94; see also A. Mortellaro and Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 91 Fla. 230, 107 So. 528 (Fla.1926); Soler v. Independent Fire Ins. Co., 625 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (record on appeal did not demonstrate that plaintiffs jurisdictional allegation was made other than in good faith); Sullivan v. Nova Univ., 613 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (bare allegation in complaint that amount in controvers…
-
Fedan Corp. v. Milva Reina, 695 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…Where the court’s jurisdiction is based on the amount in controversy, “[t]he test to determine the jurisdiction of the court is the amount in good faith claimed or put in controversy when the action is commenced.” Soler v. Independent Fire Ins. Co., 625 So. 2d 905, 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)(internal quotations and citations omitted). [*1283] When Reina commenced this action, she claimed that her damages exceeded llOjOOO.1 The circuit court has jurisdiction where the minimum amount claimed, exclusive of interest,…
-
Sabana Windows, Inc. v. Andrade, 904 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…AM. Sabana Windows, Inc. and James Abravaya appeal an order denying a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. On the issue of jurisdictional amount, we affirm on authority of Soler v. Independent Fire Ins. Co., 625 So. 2d 905, 906 (Fla. 3d DCA Í993), and Dade County v. Lambert, 334 So. 2d 844, 846 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). The remaining claims of procedural error leading up to the entry of the- final judgment involve matters which would have had to be raised on direct appeal a…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Norris v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 324 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Castellano v. Bader Bros. VAN Lines, Inc., 208 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Thibadeau v. Santini Bros., Inc., 315 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
- Sol M. Ross v. Barnett, 436 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)