FRANK J. WEST, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1993-10-22
No. 92-02152
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
625 So. 2d 975 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation. We strike from the written order, however, the finding that the condition requiring payment of costs of supervision was violated. The judge did not pronounce that the appellant had violated this condition, nor does the evidence support such a finding.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • C.A. v. State, 685 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    …rved restitution within sixty days of sentencing, rather than entering a written order. We disagree. Section 775.089, Florida Statutes (1995), and the cases interpreting it, do not require that the order be reduced to writing. See Simmons v. State, 625 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Weckerle v. State, 579 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); In re E.J., 438 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)(finding no error in a juvenile delinquency case where court made oral statement retaining jurisdiction to reserve restitution,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw