GULF PROPERTIES OF ALABAMA, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
JERRIE B. BOWER, JAMES W. MAULDEN AND L. GARY SEYMOUR
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Settlement Agreement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The parties to this appeal claim interests in a parcel of property which was condemned by the Florida Department of Transportation. The circuit court entered an order which found that appellees Bower, Maulden, and Seymour were entitled to the condemnation award and that Gulf Properties had no legal interest in that award and therefore should take nothing. Gulf Properties has appealed that order. The parties now advise this court that they have agreed to settle their dispute with the condemnation award to be distributed between them in accordance with this settlement. Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed and remand with directions to enter an order of distribution in accordance with section 73.101, Florida Statutes (1991), and the settlement reached by the parties.
ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oza Jenkins v. Motorola, Inc., 911 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…or she may not reconsider the decision to disqualify. State v. Schack, 617 So. 2d 832, 833-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). A trial judge may not reconsider an order of disqualification even if the trial judge entered the order in error. In Deberry v. Ward, 625 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), a case factually similar to the present case, the trial judge granted a motion to disqualify. Upon rehearing, he reinstated himself noting that he had made a clerical mistake and did not intend to sign the order to disqualify. T…
-
Goolsby v. State, 914 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…articipation in the case, Florida Rule Judicial Administration 2.160(f), and may not reconsider the decision to disqualify herself, State v. Schack, 617 So. 2d 832, 833-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), even if the order was entered in error. Deberry v. Ward, 625 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). As a result, any order entered simultaneously with the order of recusal, as well as any subsequent orders she enters in that case, are void and have no effect. Jenkins v. Motorola, Inc., 911 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); see Da…
-
Collado v. Heriberto Collado, 858 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…h DCA 1997). As a result, any order entered by a judge after that judge has been disqualified is void. Bolt v. Smith, 594 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Id. at 723; see also Meaweather v. State, 732 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Deberry v. Ward, 625 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); State v. Schack, 617 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).1 Therefore, we find the petitioner has met the burden to establish a legally sufficient basis for disqualification. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence