DAVID T. CHASE, APPELLANT,

v.

ESPIRITO SANTO BANK OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hall, Lamb & Hall, P.A. v. Sherlon Invs. Corp., 7 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …settlement. Putting it in legalese, the theft was the sole proximate cause of Hall’s damages. Obversely, the appellee’s missteps were immaterial to and were thus not a legal cause of the loss. See Stuart Yacht Club & Marina v. Dep’t of Natural Res., 625 So. 2d 1263, 1268-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (absence of required notice immaterial when a party acquires knowledge otherwise); see also Jones v. Fla. Ins. Guar. Assoc., 908 So. 2d 435, 452-53 (Fla.2005); ef. Clark v. Lumbermans Mut. Ins. Co., 465 So. 2d 552 (Fla.…
• Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Fla. Coal. OF Prof'l Lab. Orgs., Inc., 718 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …ion had received actual notice. Obviously, the affected party’s receipt of actual notice obviates an agency’s need to comply with the statute’s directive to provide published notice. Cf. Stuart Yacht Club & Marina v. Department of Natural Resources, 625 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (failure of agency to give requisite statutory notice of a proposed rule to a party was harmless when the party had indirectly received actual notice of the intended action). For the above reasons, we hold that all of the rules…
• Lucien Metiver v. State, 720 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …ngs were not an abuse of discretion. Cf. Hernandez v. Leiva, 391 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Sanderlen v. State, 590 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we affirm. Cf. Stuart Yacht Club & Marina, Inc. v. State, Dep’t of Natural Resources, 625 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (attorney’s fees denied under § 120.57(l)(b)10, Fla.Stat. (1993), where some agency action was incorrect, but not flagrant or inexcusable). [*1171] As to all other issues argued, we also affirm. STONE, C.J., KLEIN, J., and OWEN…

Authorities Cited

• VIC Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Bloom, 386 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)