LEE EDWARD MANNING, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jackson v. State, 634 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …promptly amended the statute to make it clear that sequential convictions were necessary. Ch. 93-406, § 2, at 2915 Laws of Fla. In Barnes the two prior convictions, which occurred the same day, did arise from separate incidents. In Cooper v. State, 625 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), the issue was whether the defendant could be sentenced as a habitual offender based on two prior felony convictions arising from a single incident. The first district concluded the defendant could be sentenced as a habitual offe…
• MacRAE v. State, 630 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …PER CURIAM. We affirm. Cooper v. State, 625 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). ERVIN, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.…
• LEE v. State, 685 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
  …two concurring justices agreed only because the two convictions under consideration, although not sequential,2 arose from separate criminal episodes. Since Barnes this distinction has been visited only once by a district court. In Cooper v. State, 625 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), a divided panel determined that two convictions arising from the same criminal episode provided the necessary predicate to classify an offender as a habitual felon. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Ms. Lee’s postconviction…

Authorities Cited

• Snead v. State, 616 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1993)
• Truman Lee Armstrong v. State, 622 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)