F.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1993-11-12
No. 92-1927
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
625 So. 2d 1335 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. B.H. v. State, 622 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Sanders v. State, 386 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Colbert v. State, 646 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
    …he guideline departure provisions. See § 921.001(5)-(8), Fla.Stat. (1991); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). In this case, the trial judge did not comply; he waited eight days to file his written reasons. This delay is reversible error. See Mock v. State, 625 So. 2d 1335 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (citing State v. Lyles, 576 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1991)); Williams v. State, 607 So. 2d 478, 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (written reasons filed three days after sentencing is reversible error). We vacate the sentence for kidnapping and re…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw