G. E. ELEAZER, J. A. TALTON, M. R. SIMS, A. B. MOORE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. CARY D. LANDIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1932-09-14
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
106 Fla. 670 Florida Supreme Court (1932) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 143 So. 760
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court he, and the sarnie is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hughes v. Summit Realty Co., Inc., 120 Fla. 136 (Fla. 1935)
    …ge of Chapter 10279, Acts of 1925, but certainly there is no basis for it now. The following cases while not in point support this view: Gentile Bros., Inc., v. Bryan, 101 Fla. 233, 133 So. 630; Bryan, et al., v. Gentile Bros., et al., 106 Fla. 900, 143 Sou. 760; Plant City Agri. Credit Co. v. Pool, et al., 103 Fla. 806, 139 So. 595; Haines City Citrus Growers v. Petteway, 107 Fla. 344, 145 So. 183; L. Maxcy, Inc., v. James, 117 Fla. 641, 158 So. 164. The right to encumber a citrus crop is a very important…
  • Weber v. Belle Mead Dev. Corp., 112 Fla. 368 (Fla. 1933)
    …e. See: Shomaker & Co. v. Waters & Davis, 56 Fla. 559, 47 Sou. Rep. 936; Summerlin v. Orange Shores, [*370] Inc., 97 Fla. 996, 122 Sou. Rep. 508, text 511; Gentile Bros. v. Bryan, 101 Fla. 233, 133 Sou. Rep. 630; Bryan v. Gentile Bros, 106 Fla. 900, 143 Sou. Rep. 760; Plant City Agri. Credit Co. v. Pool, 103 Fla. 806, 139 Sou. Rep. 595. But the latter portion of the statute regulates and provides for the only method hy which such chattel mortgages may be made valid as against subsequent encumbrances and subsequ…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw