MARK FREEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1993-11-10
No. 93-2648
GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
626 So. 2d 312 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief and remand for the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record demonstrating that the movant is not entitled to relief.

Reversed.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Comstock v. Comstock, 74 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …nto and relating to a matter upon which it is appropriate to stipulate is binding upon the parties and upon the Court.” Yeakle v. Yeakle, 12 So. 3d 884, 885-86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see Dorta v. Dorta, 626 So. 2d 312, 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (recognizing that property rights in post-dissolution marriage proceeding are enforceable under contract law). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s rulings on the enforcement matters pertaining to equitable distribution, d…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw