EMMET ROZIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EMMET ROZIER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
626 So. 2d 342
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the restitution ordered for expenses to cover the cost of the victim’s inpatient treatment. The restitution ordered for the travel expenses and lost wages of the mother of the victim are stricken, however. See Watson v. State, 579 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); Cliburn v. State, 510 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA1987). We also strike the “state attorney’s fee.” E.g., Turkaly v. State, 615 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA1993).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
GOSHORN, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bair v. Bair, 214 So. 3d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…orrect because the value of any company comprises all the company’s assets and liabilities. To attempt to value a company while excluding several major assets owned by it, as the trial court did here, is plain error. See, e.g., Randolph v. Randolph, 626 So. 2d 342, 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (noting that the value of a corporation is determined by both the value of all its assets and the amount of its liabilities and that it is error to exclude either one). In other words, the sum of all parts, not a select few,…
-
Kelley v. Kelley, 656 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…l evidence if the record is insufficient. Scott v. Scott, 643 So. 2d 1124, 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Livingston v. Livingston, 633 So. 2d 1162, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Thibault v. Thibault, 632 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Randolph v. Randolph, 626 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Dozier v. Dozier, 606 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Glover v. Glover, 601 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Moon v. Moon, 594 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Huntley v. Huntley, 578 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Turner v. Turn…
-
King v. Kelsi King, 313 So. 3d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)…market value, a trial court making an equitable distribution must consider all the company’s assets and all its liabilities. Bair v. Bair, 214 So. 3d 750, 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). It is error to exclude either one. Id. (citing Randolph v. Randolph, 626 So. 2d 342, 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)). Here, the trial court adopted Trugman’s calculation of the value of KIA’s assets at $3,223,083—based on the market approach. But the trial court rejected the rest of Trugman’s approach—where the expert assigned percentage…
Authorities Cited
- Cliburn v. State, 510 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Watson v. State, 579 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Turkaly v. State, 615 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)