JOSE ANGEL GARCIA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for trafficking and conspiracy to traffic cocaine may only be imposed if the offenses are sufficiently distinct, which was not the case here as they arose from a single criminal episode.
Jose Angel Garcia was convicted of conspiracy to commit armed burglary, armed trafficking in cocaine, and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. He appeale…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Distinct Offenses cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Jose Angel Garcia appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for conspiracy to commit armed burglary, armed trafficking in cocaine, and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. We affirm the convictions but reverse the consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and remand for entry of a corrected sentence.
Consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for trafficking and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine may only be imposed where the offenses are sufficiently distinct. Short v. State, 572 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Vickery v. State, 515 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). As in Short and Vickery, the trafficking and conspiracy offenses for which Garcia was convicted arose from a single criminal episode involving the same contraband, and were not sufficiently distinct to support consecutive mandatory minimum sentences. We find no merit in Garcia’s remaining points on appeal.
Therefore, we vacate the consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, and remand this cause for resentencing. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further consistent proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Vickery v. State, 515 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- Short v. State, 572 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)