WENDELL JORDAN, APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN GYPSUM AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the court reversed an attorney's fee award because the compensation judge's order failed to comply with statutory requirements to explain the factors considered and describe the benefits obtained by counsel.
The order is patently insufficient under Florida law. The compensation judge must enter an order that contains an explanation of the factors listed in subsection 440.34(1) and describes the benefits obtained in accordance with subsection 440.34(2).
[1] A workers' compensation order awarding attorney's fees must set forth the nature or value of the benefits secured and an explanation of the basis of the award.
[2] The amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation must be listed on all attorney's fees awarded by the judge of compensation claims.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation shall be listed on all attorney's fees awarded by the judge of compensation claims.”
This quote from section 440.34(2) establishes the statutory requirement that the compensation judge failed to meet.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWendell Jordan sought attorney's fees for services in obtaining temporary total disability benefits, medical bill payments, and costs. The parties sti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Basis For Attorney'S Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Wendell Jordan (Claimant) appeals a workers’ compensation order awarding $1,531.60 in attorney’s fees for the services of his attorney in obtaining an award of temporary total disability benefits, payment of certain medical bills, and costs. The parties stipulated that the amount of a reasonable attorney’s fee due Claimant could be determined on affidavits. Claimant submitted two affidavits, one for $14,000 and the other for $6,150. The employer and carrier submitted an affidavit evaluating the fee between $1,531.60 and $1,750.00. Claimant contends the order is legally insufficient because it fails to set forth the nature or value of the benefits secured and an explanation of the basis of the award, as required by section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1989).
The appealed order recites the following:
THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims on the question of amount of attorney[’s] fees, counsel for the parties stipulated that counsel for the Claimant is entitled to recover a reasonable attorneyt’s] fee from the Employer and Carrier/Servicing Agent, counsel for the parties stipulated that the undersigned may set the amount of attorney[’s] fees based on the affidavits submitted, the undersigned having reviewed the affidavits filed herein, it is therefore
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Employer and Carrier/Servicing Agent pay to counsel for the Claimant a reasonable attorney[’s] fee in the amount of $1,531.60 for his efforts thus far. As this order is patently insufficient to comply with the requirements of law, we summarily reverse and remand for entry of an order that contains an explanation of the factors listed in subsection 440.34(1) and describes the benefits obtained in accordance with subsection 440.34(2) (“The amount, statutory basis, and type of benefits obtained through legal representation shall be listed on all attorney’s fees awarded by the judge of compensation claims.”). See Sherwood Medical Industries v. Ward, 397 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Casings, Florida, Inc. v. Williams, 389 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles, 633 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…n claims (JCC) is required to consider as a predicate for increasing or decreasing the statutory attorney’s fee. This court has observed that such an order is “patently insufficient to comply with the requirements of law.” Jordan v. American Gypsum, 627 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Faced with such an insufficient order, this court has summarily reversed, without considering whether the amount awarded is correct. See Sherwood Medical Indus. v. Ward, 397 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Casings, Fla., Inc. v.…
Authorities Cited
- Am. Paper Chem. Prods. v. Bright, 389 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
- Casings v. Williams, 389 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
- Sherwood Med. Indus. & Gen. Adjustment Bureau v. Ward, 397 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)