MORRIS MOND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Morris Mond appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell, possession of cannabis, carrying a concealed weapon, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Mond also appeals the assessment of the cost of prosecution. We affirm the convictions but strike the cost of prosecution.
The trial court assessed $150 as the cost of prosecution without any type of inquiry. We are compelled to strike the cost and remand this case for the trial court to determine the cost pursuant to section 939.01(5), Florida Statutes (1991). See Harvey v. State, 613 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Leila Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 1995)…City of W. Palm Beach v. Education Dev. Ctr., 526 So. 2d 775, 777 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). . Post-EDC and post-Combs cases have consistently applied the standards of review espoused in each case. See, e.g., post -EDC cases: Branch v. Charlotte County, 627 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Manatee County v. Kuehnel, 542 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), review denied, 548 So. 2d 663 (Fla.1989); post-Combs cases: State v. Frazee, 617 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin, 614 So. 2d 555 (F…
-
Procacci Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Dep't OF Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 690 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…ciously. The appeal taken by Procacci was “frivolous, meritless, or an abuse of the appellate process.” Both HRS and BDC are entitled12 to be reimbursed for reasonable attorneys’ fees occasioned by the appeal. Here, as in Branch v. Charlotte County, 627 So. 2d 577, 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), the appellant’s principal strategy has been to “reargue[] the facts previously presented to the lower [tribunal].” We remand to the Division of Administration Hearings for a détermination of the amount of fees and costs. Se…
-
Consultech OF Jacksonville, Inc. v. Dep't OF Health, 876 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…roposal of the successful bidder was inferior to its own proposal. Here, as in Procacci, “the appellant’s principal strategy has been to reargue the facts previously presented to the lower [tribunal].” Id. at 609 (quoting Branch v. Charlotte County, 627 So. 2d 577, 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)). Similarly, in Lifecare Ctrs. of America, Inc. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America, 692 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), this court awarded appellate attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party where the losin…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Harvey v. State, 613 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
- In the Interest of F.A.K., 613 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)