S.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-12-14
No. 93-33
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
627 So. 2d 613 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the appellee’s appropriate concession, the adjudicatory order below shall be amended to reflect the trial judge’s oral pronouncement that the respondent was guilty of petit theft rather than grand theft as the order now erroneously states.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Isham v. State, 692 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …entence did not conform with the oral pronouncement. There was no finding about whether it would be proper on remand to sentence Isham to consecutive mandatory minimum terms for his use of a firearm in commission of the two offenses. Isham v. State, 627 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). On remand, the trial court imposed a sentence that included consecutive minimum terms. In his motion filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Isham argued that consecutive terms were improper, since t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw