RAY COOKE ENTERPRISES, INC., AND FRANK S. TURNIER, APPELLANTS,
v.
CHRISTOPHER ROBERT PARSONS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a post-judgment motion to interview a jury foreperson requires a showing of something more than conjecture and speculation regarding matters that inhere in the verdict.
Following a jury trial, the plaintiff moved to interview the jury foreperson, alleging the jury misunderstood instructions and the verdict form, poten…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Matters Inhering In The Verdict cases and more on FLexlaw
GUNTHER, Judge.
Defendants in a personal injury jury trial appeal the trial court’s order granting the plaintiff’s post-judgment motion to interview the jury foreperson. We reverse.
Plaintiff requested an informal interview on the basis that the jury misunderstood the jury instructions and the verdict form. According to the plaintiff, this misunderstanding confused the jurors regarding the manner in which they were to answer questions on the verdict form, and this confusion led to the possibility that the verdict was the opposite of what the jury intended. Plaintiffs counsel stated at the hearing on the motion to interview that he intends to seek a new trial based on the post-judgment interview.
This Court stated in Dover Corporation v. Dean, 473 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet for rev. denied, 475 So. 2d 693 (Fla.1985), that interviewing jurors after trial requires a showing of something more than conjecture and speculation by the movant as to what went wrong. The court recognized that a jury verdict cannot be attacked for reasons that inhere in the verdict, and a verdict is only vulnerable to charges that are extrinsic to the verdict. Id. at 712. A motion alleging that a juror thought her verdict would bring about a different result or that she miscalculated the damage, or did not understand the judge’s instruction on certain matters alleges matters inhering in the verdict and, therefore, are not adequate grounds for granting a jury interview. Id. at 712.
In the instant case, we agree with the defendants’ contention that the plaintiff has not set forth an extrinsic matter as his basis for the interview, but instead has attacked the verdict for reasons that inhere in the verdict. Thus, the trial court erred in granting the interview. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Laycock v. TMS Logistics, Inc., 209 So. 3d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…ders. See, e.g., Travent, Ltd. v. Schecter, 678 So. 2d 1345, 1347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (defendant "filed a petition for a writ of common law certiorari, which we treat as an appeal from the [jury interview] order”); Ray Cooke Enter., Inc. v. Parsons, 627 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (same).…1 / 2
-
Pesci v. William S. Maistrellis, M.D., 672 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)…ensure that such an order will not result in a breach of the sanctity of jury deliberations. See, e.g., Harbour Island Security Co. v. Doe, 652 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 662 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1995); Ray Cooke Enters., Inc. v. Parsons, 627 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Orange County v. Piper, 585 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Moler v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 559 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), approved, 579 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1991). In our view, the continuing vitality of this fundamenta…
-
State v. Devoney, 675 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…t guilty, do you want to turn this man loose knowing that he's got a DUI now and a prior record? Do you want to turn him loose so as to kill somebody else? . State v. Hamilton, 574 So. 2d 124 (Fla.1991). See also Ray Cooke Enters., Inc. v. Parsons, 627 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Sims v. State, 444 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1246, 104 S.Ct. 3525, 82 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984); McAllister Hotel, Inc. v. Porte, 123 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1959); State v. Ramirez, 73 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1954). . Over the…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dover Corp. v. Dean, 473 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)