STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
FRANCISCO RAMOS, JOSE RAMOS, AND LAZARO DIAZ, RESPONDENTS
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
FRANCISCO RAMOS, JOSE RAMOS, AND LAZARO DIAZ, RESPONDENTS
629 So. 2d 103
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Ramos, 608 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. That portion of the district court’s decision that affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So. 2d 90 (Fla.1993). The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Lake Worth Inlet Dist. v. Town OF Ocean Ridge, 633 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…e State would pay for 75% of the sand so transferred. To the extent that these committee reports state a conclusion different from the text actually adopted and enacted into law, they cannot and should not be taken seriously. See Coleman v. Coleman, 629 So. 2d 103 (Fla.1993) (in construing clear statute that is not unreasonable or illogical court may not go outside statutory text to give it different meaning); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Huntington Nat'l Bank, 609 So. 2d 1315 (Fla.1992) (same). . The magn…
-
State v. Ramos, 632 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…arges against defendant Lazaro Diaz. State v. Ramos, 608 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The Florida Supreme Court quashed the portion of the opinion dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz and remanded for further reconsideration. State v. Ramos, 629 So. 2d 103 (Fla.1993). . The Munoz court also held that the judiciary may objectively review "the issue of entrapment to the extent such a review involves the • due process clause of article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution.” Munoz, 629 So. 2d at 101…
-
Siravo v. Roxanne Siravo and the Honorable Leonard Fleet, 670 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…5] tinued presence is required by the court. The ne exeat bond is in the nature of a bail bond. E.g., Aiken v. Aiken, 81 So. 2d 757 (Fla.1955); Schorb v. Schorb, 547 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), disapproved of on other grounds, Coleman v. Coleman, 629 So. 2d 103 (Fla.1993). Certainly utilization of this writ is a valuable resource in the arsenal of remedies available to a trial court in order to secure alimony and support. English v. English, 117 So. 2d 559, 562 (Fla. 8d DCA), cert. denied, 122 So. 2d 407 (…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Munoz v. State, 629 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1993)
- State v. Ramos, 608 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)