MARVIN LOUIS JERALDS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1993-11-10
No. 80420
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
629 So. 2d 113 Florida Supreme Court (1993) Negative Treatment
Cited by 28 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We granted review of Jeralds v. State, 603 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), but now find that any conflict has been dispelled by Munoz v. State, 629 So. 2d 90 (Fla.1993). Therefore, we dismiss the petition for review.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (15 total)

  • Lawnwood Med. Ctr. Inc. v. Samuel H. Sadow, M.D., 43 So. 3d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    …] See also Campbell v. Jacksonville Kennel Club, 66 So. 2d 495 (Fla.1953) (words actionable per se import damage and general damages are presumed to result and need not be proved); Wagner Nugent Johnson Roth Romano Erikson & Kupfer P.A. v. Flanagan, 629 So. 2d 113, 116 n. 4 (Fla.1994) (quoting Restatement (Seoond) of Torts § 558: “one who is liable for a slander actionable per se ... ' is liable for at least nominal damages.”); Myers v. Jim Russo Prison Ministries Inc., 3 So. 3d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (same);…
  • The Putnam Berkley Grp., Inc. v. Dinin, 734 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …legislature); In re Southeast Banking Corp., 855 F.Supp. 353 (S.D.Fla.1994), aff'd, 69 F. 3d 1539 (1995) (same).” [f.o.] — So. 2d at -, 1997 WL 589312, at 3; see also Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Erikson & Kupfer, P.A v. Flan [*535] agan, 629 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1994) (rejecting judge-made discovery rule in defamation actions and holding that limitations issue is controlled “by the plain language of applicable statutes”). In section 95.031 the legislature has clearly said that “the time within which a…
  • Yusuf Mohamad Excavation, Inc. v. Ringhaver Equipment, 793 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
    …mplaint [*1128] with prejudice based upon the applicable statute of limitations. While acknowledging that the trial court was correct in dismissing its defamation claim, see Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Erikson & Kupfer, P.A. v. Flanagan, 629 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1993), Excavation contends that the court erred in refusing to apply the delayed discovery doctrine to its tortious interference with business relationship, and unfair and deceptive trade practice claims. We disagree. Section 95.11(3) of the F…

Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw