IN RE INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, NO. 92-419 RE JONATHAN T. COLBY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court adopted a stipulation between the Judicial Qualifications Commission and Judge Jonathan T. Colby, finding that the judge violated the Code of Judicial Conduct by convicting defendants in absentia without trials or pleas in traffic and DUI cases. The Court imposed a public reprimand as discipline.
Judge Colby violated Canon 1, Canon 2, and Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct through his actions of convicting defendants in their absence without pleas or trials. A public reprimand by publication of the opinion is the appropriate discipline.
[1] A judge violates the Code of Judicial Conduct by entering findings of guilt and sentencing defendants who failed to appear without a plea or trial.
[2] A judge violates the Code of Judicial Conduct by closing cases with a conviction and estreature of bond for defendants who failed to appear, without a plea or trial.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Judge Colby announced that a bench warrant for the arrest of the defendant who failed to appear was being issued; however, Judge Colby made ... entries in the files that reflected that Judge Colby found the missing defendant guilty and sentenced him or her to credit for time served”
Establishes the core misconduct of issuing warrants while simultaneously entering guilty verdicts and sentences for absent defendants
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJudge Colby, serving as a County Judge in Dade County's Traffic Division, issued bench warrants for defendants who failed to appear in court on Februa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Public Reprimand cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We review the recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission that Judge Jonathan T. Colby be disciplined for breaches of the Code of Judicial Conduct. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 12, Fla. Const. On September 23, 1993, Judge Colby entered into the following stipulation regarding the incidents in question:
The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (the “Commission”) and the Honorable Jonathan T. Colby hereby stipulate for the purpose of this inquiry:
1.That on February 19, 1992, Judge Jonathan T. Colby was serving as a County Judge of the County Court of Dade County, Traffic Division. During the calendar that day, several defendants failed to appear. In several of the cases where the defendant failed to appear, Judge Colby announced that a bench warrant for the arrest of the defendant who failed to appear was being issued; however, Judge Colby made ... entries in the files that reflected that Judge Colby found the missing defendant guilty and sentenced him or her to credit for time served[;]
2. While a County Judge of the County Court of Dade County, Traffic Division, on select cases of Driving Under the Influence where a defendant failed to appear, Judge Colby closed the cases with a conviction of the defendant and estreature of the bond posted, thereby convicting the defendant of Driving Under the Influence without a plea or trial[;]
3. Judge Colby has demonstrated that he has otherwise rendered conscientious service to the public as a judicial officer during his tenure on the bench;
4. Judge Colby regrets and apologizes that these incidents occurred and recognizes that they lessen the public’s confidence in the Judiciary;
5. Judge Colby will not contest the Recommendation of the Commission as set forth below, charging him with a violation of Canon 1, Canon 2 and Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct and will not contest charges that he violated those provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct;
6. This Stipulation will constitute the only response in this cause by Judge Colby;
7. The Commission and Judge Colby waive oral argument.
Recommendation
After full and deliberate consideration of the charges set forth in the Notice, the Commission, by a vote of at least nine (9) members, finds that the conduct of Judge Colby violated the provisions of Canon 1, Canon 2 and Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and recommends to the Supreme Court of Florida that Judge Jonathan T. Colby be publicly reprimanded for his above-described conduct and his violation of Canon 1, Canon 2 and Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The stipulation was signed by the Commission’s Chair and General Counsel on October 1, 1993, and forwarded to this Court. Accordingly, we adopt the stipulation in full as the opinion of this Court. Judge Jonathan T. Colby is hereby publicly reprimanded by publication of this opinion.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 95-412, 692 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 1997)…eems inequitable to remove Judge Johnson when Judge Colby received a public reprimand for lying in open court, falsifying records, and convicting DUI defendants without a plea or trial in cases where the defendants failed to appear. See In re Colby, 629 So. 2d 120 (Fla.1993). The new amendment recognizes the appropriateness of a middle ground between a public reprimand and removal. While it would be unfair to apply new and onerous changes in the law to conduct which preceded the law, I would apply the new am…