CABLE VISION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
CYNTHIA ARMES, APPELLEE
CABLE VISION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
CYNTHIA ARMES, APPELLEE
629 So. 2d 274
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1993)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse that portion of the compensation order which includes in the computation of AWW the fringe benefits of sick and vacation pay, personal days, employer contributions to pension plan, and free cable television, and remand for a recalculation of AWW. Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Rudd Sod Co. v. Reeves, 595 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
SMITH and KAHN, JJ., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Russell v. State, 982 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 2008)…directly conflicts with a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santiago v. State, 889 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), and the Second District Court of Appeal in Colwell v. State, 838 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and Colina v. State, 629 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), on a question of law. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we approve the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Russell, disapprove the decision of the Fourth District…
-
Gammon v. State, 778 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…llenged as purely hearsay. If the court had grounded its findings exclusively on inadmissible hearsay, it would have abused its discretion in revoking the defendant’s probation. See Young v. State, 739 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Colina v. State, 629 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). In this case, however, the testimony consisted of two types of hearsay. First, the probation officer stated that Mr. Gammon’s landlord told her that he had left his approved residence, which was a violation of condition 3, and, f…
-
Blair v. State, 805 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…elligerent to the deputy, and he did not say anything that could be deemed to be an admission to the battery. Although hearsay evidence is admissible in a probation revocation hearing, it cannot be the sole basis of the revocation. Colina v. State, 629 So. 2d 274, 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Clayton v. State, 422 So. 2d 83, 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The record reveals that the only evidence link [*877] ing Blair to the commission of a battery was the hearsay testimony of the deputy concerning what the victim said h…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Vegas v. Globe Sec. & CIGNA, 627 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Beaubrum v. State, 595 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Rudd SOD Co. & Executive Risk Consultants, Inc. v. Reeves, 595 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)