CHARLES DYCUS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES DYCUS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
629 So. 2d 275
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
THREADGILL, Judge.
The trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. However, we strike special conditions of probation numbers (4) and (7) because they were not orally announced at sentencing and the appellant had no opportunity to object to their imposition. See Gregory v. State, 616 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
HALL, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tomlinson v. State, 645 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…ohibits appellant from using intoxicants to excess. This special condition must be stricken since the trial court failed to announce it in open court, preventing appellant from having the opportunity to object to its [*2] imposition. Dycus v. State, 629 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Gregory v. State, 616 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)