S & E CONTRACTORS, INC., AS ASSIGNEE OF THE RIGHTS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
CITY OF TAMPA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1993-11-10
No. 92-04384
FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PATTERSON, 33., concur.
629 So. 2d 883 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993) Caution
Cited by 49 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/cross-appellee, S & E Contractors, Inc. (S & E), asserts in this appeal that the trial court erred in failing to award S & E attorney’s fees. Appellee/cross-appellant, City of Tampa (City), cross-appeals the award of costs and prejudgment interest to S & E. We find no error in the appeal or cross-appeal except that the final judgment awarded S & E post-judgment interest on all sums found due in the final judgment, including the prejudgment interest award. It is error to award interest on interest and, accordingly, we reverse only that part of the final judgment which awards postjudgment interest on the amount found due as prejudgment interest. See Cent. Constructors, Inc. v. Spectrum Contracting Co., 621 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PATTERSON, 33., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (48 total)

  • Roth v. Roth, 973 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
    …assets in an equitable distribution scheme that have been diminished or dissipated during the dissolution proceedings. Cooper v. Cooper, 639 So. 2d 153, 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bush v. Bush, 824 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Knecht v. Knecht, 629 So. 2d 883, 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, an exception to this general proposition exists when misconduct during the dissolution proceedings [*585] results in the dissipation of a marital asset. In that case, the misconduct may serve as a basis for assignin…
  • Young v. Martine Denn Young, 677 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …47, 1349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williamson v. Williamson, 367 So. 2d 1016 (Fla.1979). Florida law is clear that “the purpose of permanent alimony is to enable the former spouse to maintain the life-style enjoyed during the marriage.” Knecht v. Knecht, 629 So. 2d 883, 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), rev. denied, 639 So. 2d 978 (Fla.1994). In Canakaris, our supreme court explained that [permanent periodic alimony is used to provide the needs and the necessities of life to a former spouse as they have been established by…
  • Winder v. Dian A. Winder, 152 So. 3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …nished or dissipated during the dissolution proceedings.” Roth v. Roth, 973 So. 2d 580, 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (citing Cooper v. Cooper, 639 So. 2d 153, 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bush v. Bush, 824 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Knecht v. Knecht, 629 So. 2d 883, 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)). “However, an exception to this general proposition exists when misconduct during the dissolution proceedings results in the dissipation of a marital [*839] asset. In that case, the misconduct may serve as a basis for assign…

Previewing 3 of 48 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw