ROBERT LEE DUMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT LEE DUMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
630 So. 2d 232
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Porter v. State, 629 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1993); Seabrook v. State, 629 So. 2d 129 (Fla.1993).
ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Donneco King v. State, 870 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…1206, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“There is simply no rule or statutory authority for a trial court to reconsider the merits of an unappealed final order denying post conviction relief some six months after its rendition.”). See also Morris v. State, 630 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Because the State is not allowed to file a motion for rehearing under rule 3.850, the trial court lacked the authority to grant the State’s motion and vacate the final, unappealed orders allowing King to withdraw his pleas. Ther…
-
Smith v. State, 967 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…imely. Appellant’s “Motion For Reconsideration Of Defendant’s Motion For Rehearing,” is an unauthorized motion for rehearing and does not delay rendition of the trial court’s order of September 27, 2006. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h); Morris v. State, 630 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). As such, appellant’s notice of appeal should have been filed within thirty days of the trial court’s denial of appellant’s timely motion for rehearing, filed on October 6, 2006. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140. Because the notice of appeal…
-
Pamala Morgan v. State, 683 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…PER CURIAM. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Morris v. State, 630 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3rd DCA1994). DAUKSCH, SHARP, W., and ANTOON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Marblee Seabrook v. State, 629 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 1993)
- Porter v. State, 629 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 1993)