BARRY JEROME EDLER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Single Criminal Episode cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the decision of the district court of appeal in Edler v. State, 616 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The district court certified that its decision passed upon a question of great public importance: “May consecutive enhanced sentences be imposed under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, for crimes growing out of a single criminal episode?” Id. at 548. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have recently answered the certified question in the negative. Brooks v. State, 630 So. 2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993). We therefore quash that portion of the district court’s decision that affirmed petitioner’s consecutive enhanced sentences. Petitioner’s challenges to the other portions of the district court’s decision are without merit. The case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion, Hale, and Brooks.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (86 total)
-
Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)…gs before imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile did not constitute an illegal sentence subject to correction at any time, even though we had permitted that failure to be raised on direct appeal without requiring preservation. See Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528, 531-32 (Fla.1993); Rhoden, 448 So. 2d at 1017. Although the Fifth District in Maddox relied upon Summers in concluding that this Court has recently narrowed the definition of “fundamental error” to preclude consideration of unpreserved sentencing e…1 / 2
-
State v. Griffith, 675 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1996)…the law unless, in compliance with the Act, juvenile jurisdiction is waived or the juvenile falls under a statutory exception. Accordingly, in certain circumstances, children may be tried as adults and exposed to adult sanctions. Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528, 531 (Fla.1993); see §§ 39.02(5)(a) (authorizing transfer of fourteen-year-olds to adult court after waiver hearing); 39.02(5)(b) (authorizing transfer to adult court if child, joined by parent or guardian, demands to be tried as an adult); 39.02(5)…1 / 2
-
McCLOUD v. State, 653 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ed for the record. . See § 39.047(4)(e)(5), Fla.Stat. (1991). . As part of the plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal. . The making of findings under subsection 39.059(7) requires the entry of a written order. See Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528, 532 (Fla.1993).…
Previewing 3 of 86 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Brooks v. State, 630 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 1993)
- Edler v. State, 616 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)