DAN GRAHAM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
J. O. HOLMES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Per Curiam.
Holmes brought replevin to recover a mule. Defendant pleaded not guilty. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. On writ of error the defendant below, Dan Graham, contends that in the transaction relative to a contemplated sale of the mule by Holmes to Graham, the title passed to Graham and replevin was not applicable. The evidence bearing on the trade is conflicting; but the jury was justified in finding for the plaintiff, upon the theory that title had not passed to the defendant. The verdict being warranted by the evidence, technical errors if any in rulings on the admission' or rejection of testimony are not harmful or material.
The judgment is affirmed.
Browne, C. and Taylor, Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bailey v. State, 76 Fla. 213 (Fla. 1918)…bjeo tion that they were irrelevant and immaterial. [*217] Where a verdict is sustained by the evidence, technical but harmless errors in rulings on the admission or rejection of testimony will not cause a reversal of the judgment. Graham v. Holmes, 73 Fla. 85, 74 South. Rep. 5; Owens v. State, 65 Fla. 483, 62 South. Rep. 651; Gorey v. State, 71 Fla. 195, 71 South. Rep. 328. While the legal effect of evidence. or the lack of evidence in its relation to a verdict rendered in a trial, may by appropriate pr…
-
Guernsey v. Haley, 107 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)…lic interest. See 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals § 290, page 538; 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, § 251, page 35; First National Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Company, 1841, 189 Old. 9, 112 P. 2d 1087; State Board of Control v. King Lumber Co., 73 Fla. 80, 74 So. 5; Board of Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Vahlberg, 198 Old. 527, 180 P. 2d 144; United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 56 S.Ct. 391, 80 L.Ed. 555.” If the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought, the appellate court may, on appeal, remand…
-
Ewing v. Dupee, 104 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)…lic interest. See 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals § 290, page 538; 3 Am.Jur., Appeal and Error, § 251, page 35; First National Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Company, 1841, 189 Okl. 9, 112 P. 2d 1087; State Board of Control v. King Lumber Co., 73 Fla. 80, 74 So. 5; Board of Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Vahlberg, 198 Okl. 527, 180 P. 2d 144; United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 56 S.Ct. 391, 80 L.Ed. 555. The ordinance establishing the retirement system in the City of Lake Worth has the following provis…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence