MAE FRANCES WARE, APPELLANT,
v.
M & N PLASTICS, INC. AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLEES
MAE FRANCES WARE, APPELLANT,
M & N PLASTICS, INC. AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLEES
633 So. 2d 516
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC), denying a claim for temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, wage-loss benefits, and chiropractic treatment. After careful review of the record, we are unable to agree with claimant that the JCC erred in accepting the testimony of two orthopedic surgeons and a neurologist over that of claimant’s treating chiropractor as to claimant’s entitlement to benefits and need for chiropractic treatment.
The order appealed from is therefore affirmed.
BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and SHIVERS, S.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dortch v. Alachua Cnty. Sch. Bd. (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)…is the proper remedy to compel a public official’s performance of a ministerial duty that is clearly required by law when there is no other adequate legal remedy. Volusia Cty. v. Eubank, 151 So. 2d 37, 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Pace v. Singletary, 633 So. 2d 516, 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). A ministerial duty is one that does not involve the exercise of discretion. See Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Bd., 155 So. 2d 353, 356 (Fla. 1963) (holding mandamus…