EUGENE J. DYREK, APPELLANT,
v.
MADCEM OF FLORIDA, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the adverse determination of the unemployment compensation claim against Madcem because the initial appeal was untimely.
Appellant filed two claims for unemployment compensation, one against Loewen and one against Madcem. The claim against Loewen was resolved in his favo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unemployment Compensation Benefits Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an adverse determination of a claim for unemployment compensation. We affirm.
Appellant, Eugene J. Dyrek, was employed during 1991 and during January and part of February 1992 by Loewen Group International, Inc., as a pre-need funeral home counselor. In February of 1992 he left Loewen to work for Madcem of Florida, Inc., where he was employed until May of 1992, at which time he returned to Loewen. A short time later he was discharged from that employment. In July of 1992 appellant filed two claims for unemployment compensation, one against Loewen and one against Madcem. His claim against Loewen was resolved in his favor and no appeal was taken. This court has determined that the favorable award remains outstanding, never having been appealed, modified or set aside.
Appellant’s claim against Madcem, however, the subject of this appeal, resulted in a determination adverse to appellant. His initial appeal was untimely. In that posture we have no alternative but to affirm the adverse determination, and we do so.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.