VINCENT G. BROCKLEBANK, APPELLANT,
v.
EASTERN FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Section 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991); Griffiths v. Barnett Bank of Naples, 603 So. 2d 690, 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (The court, in construing Section 687.0304 as to an oral credit agreement, upheld summary judgment in favor of the lender, stating that, “the absence of any written credit agreement bars an action against the bank on the credit agreement.”); see AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 515 So. 2d 180 (Fla.1987); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 510 So. 2d 899 (Fla.1987); Canell v. Areola Housing Corp., 65 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1953); GAF Corp. v. Zack Co., 445 So. 2d 350, 351 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 453 So. 2d 45 (Fla.1984); Ostman v. Lawn, 305 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hodgdon v. State, 789 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 2001)…SHAW, J. We have for review the decision in Hodgdon v. State, 764 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), which certified conflict with the decision in Bailey v. State, 634 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. This case presents us with the opportunity to clarify our holding in Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla.1993). TRIPP V. STATE In Tnpp the defendant pled guilty to charg…
-
Mongiouvi v. State, 639 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…tence, we are unable to determine whether the trial court did in fact award any such credit. In its response, the state agrees that the appellant is entitled to the benefit of Tripp and urges us to certify the question certified in Bailey v. State, 634 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA), review dismissed, 637 So. 2d 233 (Fla.1994). The state further requests that the record be supplemented with the guidelines scoresheet and an affidavit from DOC setting forth the number of days actually served and the number of days…
-
Rouse v. State, 643 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). The fact that appellant entered into a plea agreement for a particular sentence does not preclude him from asserting entitlement to credit for previous prison time served on related offenses. See Jones; Bailey v. State, 634 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA), review dismissed, 637 So. 2d 233 (Fla.1994). The plea agreement made no mention of the application of prison and earned gain time to the violation of probation sentences. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying appellant’s rule 3.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- AFM Corp. v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 515 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1987)
- Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 510 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 1987)
- Canell v. Arcola Hous. Corp., 65 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1953)
- GAF Corp. v. The Zack Co., 445 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
- Ostman v. Lawn, 305 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Crews v. State, 603 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)