IN RE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION RULE 2.110(B)
IN RE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION RULE 2.110(B)
634 So. 2d 604
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
(b) Costs in County Courts. The chief judge of a circuit shall by administrative order establish a schedule of costs, in conformity with any provisions of law, to be assessed against a defendant in the county court and paid to the county for violations of municipal ordinances which are prosecuted in county court. The costs shall be assessed as a set dollar amount per convictions, not to exceed $50 including excluding any other statutory costs.
The amendment shall be effective immediately upon the filing of this order.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Major League Baseball v. Morsani, 790 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2001)…tics, Inc., 526 So. 2d 46, 48 (Fla.1988) ("The Authority waived the statute of limitations defense by electing not to plead it even though the Authority claims to have been aware the defense was available.”). . See, e.g., Branca v. City of Miramar, 634 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1994); Noble v. Yorke, 490 So. 2d 29 (Fla.1986); Miami Gardens, Inc. v. Conway, 102 So. 2d 622 (Fla.1958); State ex rel. Watson v. Gray, 48 So. 2d 84 (Fla.1950); Steen v. Scott, 144 Fla. 702, 198 So. 489 (1940); New York Life Ins. Co. v. Oates…
-
Ammons v. Okeechobee Cnty., 710 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…fficial, which was completely unauthorized and in violation of the legislative direction through the county’s ordinances. Estoppel cannot be asserted against a government entity based on mistaken statements of the law. See Branca v. City of Miramar, 634 So. 2d 604, 606 (Fla.1994). The appellants were on constructive notice of the contents of the ordinance and are presumed to have constructive knowledge of the nature and extent of the powers of governmental agents who issue permits. See Godson v. Town of Surfs…
-
Morsani v. Major League Baseball, 739 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…nly applies to limit defenses that toll the statute of limitations. The doctrine of equitable estoppel has been recognized and applied in numerous contexts by the supreme court since the inception of statehood. See, e.g., Branca v. City of Miramar, 634 So. 2d 604 (Fla.1994); Noble v. Yorke, 490 So. 2d 29 (Fla.1986); Miami Gardens, Inc. v. Conway, 102 So. 2d 622 (Fla.1958); State ex rel. Watson v. Gray, 48 So. 2d 84 (Fla.1950); Steen v. Scott, 144 Fla. 702, 198 So. 489 (1940); New York Life Ins. Co. v. Oates,…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence