ROBERT MUNCH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT MUNCH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
634 So. 2d 679
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant’s conviction for armed robbery is affirmed. However, as the state concedes, the trial court erred in failing to award the defendant credit for time served in jail prior to sentencing. See § 921.161, Fla. Stat. The defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for computation of jail time credit. See Arnette v. State, 593 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; AND CAUSE REMANDED.
COBB, PETERSON and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Diaz v. State, 695 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…ssion of error, we find that the trial court erred when it sentenced Diaz and failed to indicate on the sentencing order that he was entitled to receive credit for time served prior to sentencing. See § 921.161(1), Fla. Stat. (1994); Munch v. State, 634 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Accordingly, on remand, the trial court shall grant Diaz credit for time previously served before sentencing. Reversed and remanded with instructions.…
Authorities Cited
- Arnette v. State, 593 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)