KAISER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
STATIA TERMINALS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
KAISER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
STATIA TERMINALS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
634 So. 2d 1144
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment entered below is reversed because there are genuine issues as to (a) whether the phrase in dispute has the meaning contended for by the appellant and (b) whether, if so, it formed a part of the binding agreement between the parties.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Wright v. State, 705 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…police officer can be supported by circumstantial evidence from which a jury could infer that the defendant believed that his conduct was necessary to defend himself from an officer’s use of excessive force in making an arrest. See Johnson v. State, 634 So. 2d 1144, 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). To raise self-defense, a defendant does not have to testify directly about his intent behind an act occurring in the past, or that he made a conscious decision to defend himself in a certain way. Not remembering an event d…
-
O'Hara v. State, 642 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…, the trial court should have instructed the jury on the defense’s requested instruction on resisting an unlawful arrest without violence, Dean v. State, 466 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and justifiable use of non-deadly force, Johnson v. State, 634 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We also note that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that “Officer Lamm was an officer and was an officer within the meaning of the law.” Under Wright v. State, 586 So. 2d 1024 (Fla.1991), the trial court should mere…
-
Goode v. State, 856 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…cts and had been properly instructed, could have concluded that the appellant’s actions were defensive and reasonable, even when the appellant testified that she did not remember important facts central to the charges against her); Johnson v. State, 634 So. 2d 1144, 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (reversing and remanding for a new trial because the trial court failed to give the requested instruction of self-defense, when the appellant provided circumstantial evidence from which a jury could infer that the appellant…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence