JOHN COMBEST, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)
  …e No. 95,060), claims that a statutory condition of probation is unconstitutionally vague. Even before the Act, however, the Second District found that a claim that a condition of probation is vague must be preserved for appeal. See Maxlow v. State, 636 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Medina v. State, 604 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The Fifth District cited Maxlow as authority in this case, see Rider, 724 So. 2d at 619, and we agree that this challenge should have been preserved for appellate review in the t…
• Remich v. State, 696 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …affirm the trial court’s ruling on this ground. Although we affirm revocation of Re-mich’s community control, we must nevertheless remand for further proceedings. A revocation order must set forth the specific conditions violated. Maxlow v. State, 636 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Haynes, 571 So. 2d at 1381-82. The trial court failed to enter such an order in this case. Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for entry of a written order setting forth Remich’s violations of condition ten of the community…
• Mosley v. State, 654 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand to the trial court with directions to enter a written order of probation revocation. Maxlow v. State, 636 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Appellant need not be present for this purpose. Sing Eng v. State, 350 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.…