PAUL W. HOFFMANN, PETITIONER,
v.
THE RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER OF BROADVIEW SAVINGS BANK AND SENTINEL COMMUNITIES, INC., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 4th DCA | 1994-05-11
No. 94-0759
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
636 So. 2d 865 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a trial court departed from essential requirements of law by ordering the execution of a medical release authorization without a showing that the records could not be obtained through other discovery procedures.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought certiorari review of a trial court order compelling the execution of an authorization for release of medical records. Respondents so…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for writ of certiorari review of an order requiring petitioner to execute an authorization for release of medical records relating to counseling and alcohol abuse treatment. We grant the petition and quash the trial court’s order. We find that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by requiring petitioner to sign a medical release authorization where respondents failed to show that the records could not be obtained through the use of discovery procedures otherwise available under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Condon v. Community Psychiatric Centers, 583 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Wilson v. Rodriguez, 547 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Reinhardt v. Northside Motors, Inc., 479 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Johnston v. Donnelly, 581 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Of course, this holding does not preclude the possibility that respondents might eventually show that they have been unable to obtain the information sought in the medical release using available discovery procedures.

We further note that the Third and Fifth Districts have both held that a movant need not exhaust all available remedies pursuant to the discovery rules prior to obtaining an order compelling the execution of a medical release. Both courts have certified conflict with Reinhardt and Johnston. See Rojas v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 625 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), rev. granted, Rojas v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 634 So. 2d 626 (Fla.1994) and Doelfel v. Trevisani, 630 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. pending, No. 83,218 (Fla. Feb. 18, 1994).

Likewise, we certify conflict with Rojas and Doelfel.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw