CHRISTOPHER WILBON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Eager v. Eager, 696 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …husband’s business1 (a non-marital asset). She is correct that the enhancement in value of a non-marital asset due to marital labor or effort is a material asset subject to equitable distribution. § 61.075(5)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1995); Webb v. Webb, 636 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). As the former husband owns fifty percent of the stock of the business, fifty percent of the enhancement in value, if any, caused by marital labor would be available for equitable distribution. The trial court found, however, that…
• Rosen v. Rosen, 655 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …that under the circumstances of this case and the mandates of section 61.08, an award of alimony may be appropriate.1 A [*155] ruling on the wife’s request for alimony requires a consideration of the factors listed in section 61.08(2). Webb v. Webb, 636 So. 2d 883, 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Although the wife receives disability income, that income is inadequate to cover her expenses and the payments end in 1996. Here, the record reflects that the parties were married for 23 years. The husband was the primary wa…
• Cisneros v. Cisneros, 831 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …s of section 61.075(5)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2001), which defines this as marital appreciation. The trial court properly awarded the husband $35,000.00 as equitabla distribution of the active appreciation of the wife’s property. See Webb v. Webb, 636 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(“Marital appreciation of separately owned assets is subject to equitable distribution if either spouse expended marital labor on that asset... .”); Heinrich v. Heinrich, 609 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(appreciation of non-marital…

Authorities Cited

• Swain v. State, 502 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
• Ellis Taylor, Jr. v. State, 171 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
• Smith v. State, 175 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)