JEFFREY ALAN WEEKLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1994-05-24
No. 93-1053
Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.
636 So. 2d 896 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating “that his counsel did not provide reasonably effective performance and that, absent counsel’s deficient performance, the jury would have reached a different result.” Williams v. State, 515 So. 2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla.1981); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The trial court properly determined that defendant was not entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Marshall v. State, 672 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …ed to inquire as to whether he had any cause to show why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt, and further failed to give him an opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830; Cook v. State, 636 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Peters v. State, 626 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Martinez v. State, 339 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), approved, 346 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1977). Therefore, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings to allow the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw