STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
BREK TRABERT, DANIEL TRABERT, KAREN WOODBY AND JUDY WOODBY, APPELLEES
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
BREK TRABERT, DANIEL TRABERT, KAREN WOODBY AND JUDY WOODBY, APPELLEES
637 So. 2d 72
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this case, the trial court found that section 775.085, Florida Statutes (1991), Florida’s so-called Hate Crimes Statute, was an unconstitutional violation of appellees’ First Amendment rights and, on that basis, struck the resulting enhancement of appellees’ sentences. Since the Florida Supreme Court has recently, in State v. Stalder, 630 So. 2d 1072 (Fla.1994), held contrary to that determination that section 775.085 does not unconstitutionally violate the First Amendment, we reverse.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and BLUE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rohleder v. Wiberg, 128 So. 3d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…refiled again, rule 1.420(d) provides that only the first court has the authority to assess costs incurred by the defendant in the first case. See, e.g., Field v. Nelson, 380 So. 2d 547, 547-48 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Winford Lindsay & Assocs. v. Cook, 637 So. 2d 72, 73 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Round-tree v. Hartford Accident & Indem., 327 So. 2d 882, 882-83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In Winford Lindsay, 637 So. 2d 72, and Roundtree, 327 So. 2d 882, the district courts granted certiorari relief because the second courts i…1 / 3
Authorities Cited
- State v. Stalder, 630 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 1994)