GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
SUSAN GAIL JENKINS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1994-03-31
No. 81691
McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur., BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.
637 So. 2d 911 Florida Supreme Court (1994) Negative Treatment
Cited by 103 cases
Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.

OVERTON, Justice.

We quash the decision of the district court in Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Jenkins, 616 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), on the authority of World Wide Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Welker, No. 80,478, — So. 2d — (Fla. Mar. 31, 1994), and remand for further proceedings consistent with our decision in Welker. It is so ordered.

McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.

Concurrence
BARKETT, Chief Justice,

BARKETT, Chief Justice,

concurring specially.

I would have approved the decision of the district court for the reasons discussed in my dissent in World Wide Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Welker, — So. 2d — (Fla. Mar. 31, 1994). In light of this court’s decision in Welker, I concur with the majority.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

  • State v. Collin Gray, 654 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1995)
    …cle V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Gray also argues that this Court should reexamine its decision in Amlotte. Because we have jurisdiction based on the certified question, we also have jurisdiction over this issue. Feller v. State, 637 So. 2d 911, 914 (Fla.1994). We find it unnecessary to answer the certified question because we recede from [*553] our holding in Amlotte that there is a criminal offense of attempted felony murder. The relevant facts of this case are that Gray and two codefe…
  • In re the Adoption OF Baby E.A.W. G.W.B. v. J.S.W., 658 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1995)
    …/or emotional abuse toward the mother during her pregnancy. G.W.B. raises two other issues. We have jurisdiction over these issues because of our jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision based on the certified question. Feller v. State, 637 So. 2d 911, 914 (Fla.1994). First, we find no merit to G.W.B.’s argument that the trial court was unduly prejudiced by best-interests evidence because the final order on rehearing clearly indicates that the judge did not consider this evidence. Second, while w…
  • Frances v. State, 970 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 2007)
    …urt’s refusal to allow professor of psychology to testify as expert witness in the field of eyewitness identification). Additionally, it is not proper to allow an expert to vouch for the truthfulness or credibility of a witness. See Feller v. State, 637 So. 2d 911, 915 (Fla.1994); State v. Townsend, 635 So. 2d 949, 958 (Fla.1994). Thus, the trial court [*815] did not abuse its discretion in excluding this testimony. Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances Frances claims that his death sentences are imprope…

Previewing 3 of 52 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw