JERRY LEWIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
[*98] PER CURIAM.
Jerry Lewis appeals the dismissal of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This court previously reversed and remanded the summary denial of his motion in Lewis v. State, 629 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). On remand, the trial court dismissed the motion for lack of a proper oath. The trial court’s order, however, did not dismiss without prejudice to refiling a properly sworn motion as it is required to do. See Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993).
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order of dismissal, but do so without prejudice to the appellant’s refiling the motion with the proper oath.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hempstead v. State, 980 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…h. The court then denied the claims with prejudice. The proper remedy for the omission of an oath is a dismissal without prejudice. Patton v. State, 784 So. 2d 380, 389 (Fla.2000); Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993); Lewis v. State, 638 So. 2d 97, 98 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Thus, the postconviction court erred in denying claims 72-74 with prejudice. We reverse the denial of these claims with prejudice and, as stated above, direct the postconviction court to consider Hempstead’s second motion to…
-
Caesar Orosco v. State, 801 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…. The trial court correctly refused to consider them because the motion was unsworn. Rather than denying the motion, however, the trial court should have dismissed it without prejudice to Orosco’s right to refile a sworn motion. See" Lewis v. State, 638 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Therefore, our affirmance is without prejudice to Orosco’s right to file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion. Any motion filed within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate shall be considered timely filed. See, e.g., Finan v.…
-
Parker v. State, 638 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…[*636] PER CURIAM. Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant’s refiling his motion for posteonviction relief with the proper oath. See Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170 (Fla.1993); Lems v. State, 638 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1993)
- Lewis v. State, 629 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)