MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
638 So. 2d 209
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Opinion of the Court
[*210] PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal,1 we ñnd no error occurred below and we affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we strike that part of the probation order which charges Hernandez with a Public Defender’s fee of $200.00, since he was not advised of his right to contest the fee, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720. See, e.g., Smith v. State, 632 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Dujfey v. State, 629 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED in part; assessment of Public Defender fees STRICKEN.
HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Smith v. State, 632 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Kendall Postell v. State, 629 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)