AARON L. BOSTIC, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fleeing A Police Officer cases and more on FLexlaw
COBB, Judge.
The appellant, Aaron Lee Bostic, was found guilty by a jury of fleeing a police officer, driving without a license, improper tag, resisting arrest without violence, battery and battery upon a law enforcement officer. He was sentenced as a habitual felon. He challenges the felony conviction of battery upon an officer, contending that the evidence was insufficient to show that he intentionally touched the arresting officer. He argues that his action of holding the officer’s arm during the course of a struggle may have been a defensive reflex that cannot support conviction of a specific intent crime.
We agree with the argument of the state that mental intent is rarely subject to direct proof, and must be established based on surrounding circumstances in the case. Brewer v. State, 413 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 426 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1983). At trial the state presented two witnesses who testified that Bostic grabbed the arresting officer’s arm while Bostic was forcibly resisting arrest. Thus, a jury issue was presented.
AFFIRMED. .
HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paul v. Holbrook, 696 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…rt also found that Paul failed to produce evidence establishing Hol-brook’s intent to commit a battery. Proof of intent to commit battery is rarely subject to direct proof, but must be established based on surrounding circumstances. Bostic v. State, 638 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Based on the record before this court, a jury could reasonably infer that Holbrook intended to touch Paul in a matter that would constitute a battery. No evidence of an intention to cause harm is necessary. The trial court prop…
Authorities Cited
- Brewer v. State, 413 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)