HUGO TEJADA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HUGO TEJADA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
638 So. 2d 635
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1991).
STONE, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Isaiah Leon Thomas v. State, 191 So. 3d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…t constitutes a member of the defense attorney’s “legal staff.” Even so, case law in civil cases supports work product protection of expert witnesses or consultants who will not be testifying at trial. In Healthtrust, Inc.-The Hospital Co. v. Behan, 638 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), for example, this Court quashed a trial court order allowing the deposition of an expert witness who was not designated as an expert witness for trial, ruling that work product protected against deposition of the expert. Id. at…
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1991)