JIMMY B. MCCLOUD A/K/A DAVID ARNOLD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Jimmy McCloud appeals from an order denying his “motion to correct jail-time.” We reverse.
He alleges that he is entitled to receive the same 333 days’ credit in case no. 90-3279 as he received in case no. 85-3259. The trial court denied the motion based on the appellant’s arrest and sentencing dates in case no. 90-3279. If the appellant was not arrested for the charges brought in case no. 90-3279 until the date provided in the order, then the trial court correctly denied relief. See Keene v. State, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (for each sentence, defendant entitled only to credit for time spent in jail for charge which led to that sentence). The court, however, failed to attach any documentation evidencing the arrest and sentencing dates. See Summerall v. State, 637 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order. On remand, if the court again denies relief, it must attach portions of its records that refute the appellant’s allegations. If the appellant is aggrieved by any subsequent action of the trial court, he must file a timely notice of appeal to obtain further appellate review.
Reversed and remanded.
RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stevens v. State, 651 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…llant’s motion to correct jail time, the trial court should have attached documentation evidencing the arrest and sentencing dates, or documentation that refutes appellant’s claim. Faust v. State, 644 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); McCloud v. State, 638 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Alexander v. State, 638 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Other than appellant’s statement to the trial court that he had been in custody for six and one-half months, the appellate record contains no definitive explanation as to the…
-
Harris v. State, 660 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…may determine whether Defendant understood his plea and enhancement due to the use of a deadly weapon. REVERSED AND REMANDED. FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur. . Defendant attempted to move to withdraw his plea at resentencing. Cf. Kravitz v. State, 638 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Further, Defendant's plea agreement specifically does not waive his right to appeal any sentence outside the guidelines unless specifically contained with the plea agreement. Cf. Norman v. State, 634 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 199…
-
Cordell Ashford v. State, 652 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…sentences were not as agreed, they are still legal sentences, and Ashford has not moved to withdraw his plea. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to review them. See Duhart v. State, 548 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); see also Kravitz v. State, 638 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Since this case has to be remanded for further action, however, the trial court may wish to reconsider Ashford’s sentencing in light of the agreement between Ashford and the State. Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in par…
Authorities Cited
- Keene v. State, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
- Summerall v. State, 637 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)