MARIA ALVAREZ, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1994-06-14
Nos. 94-90 to 94-92
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
638 So. 2d 992 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Maria Alvarez appeals the revocation of her probation. At the time Maria Alvarez was placed on probation, she was read the conditions of her probation and she signed the probation orders. After her release from jail, she contacted her probation officer, but failed to keep her first probation appointment, and made no attempt thereafter to schedule a meeting with her probation officer, file monthly reports, or otherwise fulfill the conditions of her probation.

The record of the probation revocation hearing reveals that the judge directly questioned Alvarez closely and found, on Alvarez’s own admission, that she was in willful violation of her probation conditions. See Morales v. State, 622 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Thomas v. State, 453 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Accordingly, we affirm..


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • E.J. v. State, 29 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …Wilson v. State, 781 So. 2d 1185, 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (noting that whether a violation of probation is willful and substantial is a factual issue that cannot be overturned on appeal unless there is no evidence to support it); Alvarez v. State, 638 So. 2d 992, 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (affirming the revocation of the defendant’s probation for failing to attend her first probation appointment and making no attempt thereafter to schedule a meeting with her probation officer). Because failure to report to th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw