STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES AND JOANNA H. MAUS, APPELLANTS,
v.
ARTHUR MAUS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The complaint stated a cause of action for reimbursement of public assistance, and the trial court erred in dismissing it with prejudice.
The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services sought reimbursement for public assistance paid on behalf of a minor child from the child's fathe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Failure To State A Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. In the complaint, the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services sought reimbursement of public assistance paid on behalf of a minor child. Because we find that the complaint states a cause of action, we reverse.
The complaint, which alleges, inter alia, that the minor child has been the beneficiary of public assistance and that the father/appel-lee is a legally responsible parent, states a cause of action under section 409.2561, Florida Statutes (1993). While the complaint is neither a model of clarity nor specificity, it states ultimate facts sufficient to indicate the existence of a cause of action for reimbursement of public assistance funds. See Greenwald v. Triple D Preparations, Inc., 424 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (a complaint need only state ultimate facts sufficient to indicate the existence of a cause of action).
Additionally, we find that the trial court impermissibly received evidence and went beyond the four corners of the complaint in ruling on the motion to dismiss. See Burnett Corp. v. Strawgate, 475 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (in ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court may not look beyond the four corners of the complaint).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
DELL, C.J., and HERSEY and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Greenwald v. Triple D Props., Inc., 424 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Thomas v. Kearns, Jr., 424 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Burnett Corp. v. Strawgate, 475 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)