E. E. WEST AND W. J. HILDERBRANDT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
E. E. WEST AND W. J. HILDERBRANDT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
75 Fla. 377
Florida Supreme Court (1918)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Circuit Judge.
This case is exactly the same 'in every .respect as the case of E. E. West and W. J. Hildebrandt vs State of Florida, which is designated as case number one, and which has just been decided by this Court affirming the judgment of the court below.
The questions involved, both in. law and fact, being precisely the same as those involved in-said case number one, the judgment in this case is. hereby affirmed at the cost of the Plaintiffs in Error. . .
. Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and. Ellis, J. J., concur. West, J., disqualified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. All Fla. Sur. Co., 59 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1952)…that the offense charged must be stated in the appearance *851 bond and that the liability of a surety is not to be extended beyond the terms of his contract and to that extent he is bonded. West v. State, 75 Fla. 342, 78 So. 275, and West v. State, 75 Fla. 377, 78 So. 285; Catlett v. State, 75 Fla. 375, 78 So. 284; Gato v. Warrington, 37 Fla. 542, 19 So. 883; Jennings v. Landrum, 51 Fla. 643, 40 So. 195. Sections 903.31 and 909.05, are to some effect as these decisions. In our view, the statute and decis…