ROBERT T. BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT T. BROWN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
639 So. 2d 1133
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant asserts as error the imposition of a minimum mandatory corrective sentence for Count II in circuit court case number CR92-1936 and local court costs of $7.50 in circuit court case numbers CR92-1935, CR92-1936 and CR92-2139. The state concedes scrivener’s error. Accordingly, the minimum mandatory sentence for Count II, case number CR92-1936,- and the local court costs in each of the circuit court cases are stricken. The judgment and sentence as corrected is affirmed.
AFFIRMED as corrected.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marcus v. Miller, 663 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…is added). By reversing at bar, we align ourselves with the other district courts of appeal that have recognized that the pre-1990 version of the statute applies to causes of action that accrued before October 1990. See Pickett v. Tequesta Dev. Co., 639 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (the preamended version of section 768.79 providing for an award of fees and costs against the plaintiff only where the plaintiff obtains a judgment against the defendant applies to the appellants since their cause of action accr…