TOMMIE JAKE WILLIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TOMMIE JAKE WILLIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
640 So. 2d 1188
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Justice v. State, 658 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…not sure how important it is to the debate, I take issue with the statement that the addition of unannounced conditions of probation is not a major source of appeals. It is and has been for several years. A few recent examples are: Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Jamail v. State, 637 So. 2d 362 [*1032] (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Peterson v. State, 645 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Chicone v. State, 644 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review d…1 / 2
-
Chicone v. State, 644 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…on probation dated November 12, 1993, and made nunc pro tunc to October 6, 1993, is vacated and the cause remanded for reconciliation of the oral and written sentences. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) and Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (vacating sentences and remanding for resentencing and resolution of discrepancies where trial courts imposed special conditions of probation in written sentences which were not orally pronounced at sentencing). SENTENCE VACATE…
-
The Libertarian Party OF Fla. v. Smith, 665 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…in support of the statute, taking into consideration the extent to which those interests make it necessary to burden the plaintiffs’ rights. Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780, 789, 103 S.Ct. 1564, 1570, 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983); see Fulani v. Smith, 640 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 651 So. 2d 1193 (Fla.1995). The rigorousness of our inquiry depends upon the extent to which the challenged statute burdens First and Fourteenth Amendment rights; severe restrictions must be narrowly tailored to adv…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Marlette Evette Cleveland v. State, 617 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)