JOHN TEASLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; IN THE INTEREST OF R.M.B., A CHILD, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Joint And Several Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellants, after pleading nolo conten-dere to burglary of a dwelling, challenge subsequent trial court orders directing Teas-ley to pay $7,500 in restitution1 and R.M.B. to pay $1,500 in restitution.2 We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
The amount of restitution that Teasley was ordered to pay for a native American ceremonial pipe is not supported by the evidence. We accordingly reverse and remand for another hearing to determine the amount of restitution to be ordered for this item. In all other respects, the orders on appeal are affirmed.
Reversed in part and remanded.
BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur. . Teasley's liability was joint and several with two other co-defendants, H.S. and Gary Wilson. See Wilson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) and H.S. v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
. R.M.B.’s liability was joint and several with co-defendant T.F.F.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…for this item. In all other respects, the order on appeal is affirmed. Reversed in part and remanded. BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur. . Appellant's liability was joint and several with that of two co-defendants. See Teasley v. State, 640 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), and H.S. v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).…
-
In the Interest of H.S. v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…l is affirmed. Reversed in part and remanded. BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ„ concur. . Appellant’s liability was joint and several with that of two co-defendants. See Wilson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) and Teasley v. State, 640 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).…
Authorities Cited
- Wilson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- In the Interest of H.S. v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)